Assessor Resource

MSS405007
Introduce competitive systems and practices to a small or medium enterprise

Assessment tool

Version 1.0
Issue Date: May 2024


This unit of competency covers the skills and knowledge required to introduce competitive systems and practices into a small or medium operations enterprise (SME). The unit may also apply to any small or medium not-for-profit organisation seeking to improve their processes through competitive systems and practices. The unit covers any constraints that may be placed on how competitive systems and practices are introduced and which aspects of competitive systems and practices are introduced due to the limitations of being a SME.

This unit requires the application of skills associated with problem solving, initiative, enterprise, planning and organising in order to determine competitive systems and practices processes appropriate for a small business environment. This unit also requires communication and analysis skills to gather information about processes and implement competitive systems and practices strategies.

No licensing, legislative or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.

You may want to include more information here about the target group and the purpose of the assessments (eg formative, summative, recognition)



Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element.

1

Analyse the current operations systems and processes

1.1

Review the reasons for introducing competitive systems and practices and confirm the expected benefits with relevant stakeholders.

1.2

Determine any internal limiting factors which will constrain the introduction of competitive systems and practices.

1.3

Determine any external limiting factors which will constrain the introduction of competitive systems and practices.

1.4

Quantify expected returns from achieving the benefits of introducing competitive systems and practices.

2

Develop strategic and tactical plans to introduce competitive systems and practices to the SME

2.1

Develop a strategic plan for the SME that takes into account the nature of its business and relationships with suppliers and customers.

2.2

Where required, seek authority for the implementation of the strategic plan.

2.3

Identify components of competitive strategy which will yield quick returns.

2.4

Identify actions which will free up required resources to allow for the introduction of competitive systems and practices.

2.5

Develop achievable tactical plans which are compatible with strategy.

2.6

Develop key performance indicators (KPIs) for strategic and tactical plans.

2.7

Consult with relevant stakeholders to confirm tactical plans.

2.8

Prioritise plans for order of implementation.

3

Implement competitive systems and practices

3.1

Implement priority tactical plan.

3.2

Determine benefits from change.

3.3

Use benefits from priority plan to assist in the implementation of further tactical plans.

3.4

Review progress towards strategic objectives and adjust plans, as appropriate, in consultation with relevant stakeholders.

Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and include the ability to introduce competitive systems and practices to a SME and to:

analyse the organisation’s current operations

develop strategic and tactical plans for the introduction of competitive systems and practices

implement those plans.

Must provide evidence that demonstrates sufficient knowledge to interact with relevant personnel and be able to introduce competitive systems and practices to a SME, including knowledge of:

analysis of current operations/value stream mapping

competitive systems and practices tools which may be relevant

strategy vs tactics

kaizen/kaizen blitz applications

prioritisation of proposed actions/plans.

The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.

The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:

a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria

multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.

A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.

Assessment should use a real project introducing competitive systems and practices to a SME workplace.

Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).

Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.

Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.

Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.

Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.

The assessor must demonstrate both technical competency and currency.

Technical competence can be demonstrated through:

relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment AND/OR

relevant workplace experience

Currency can be demonstrated through:

performing the competency being assessed as part of current employment OR

having consulted with an organisation providing relevant environmental monitoring, management or technology services about performing the competency being assessed within the last twelve months.


Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assingnment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element.

1

Analyse the current operations systems and processes

1.1

Review the reasons for introducing competitive systems and practices and confirm the expected benefits with relevant stakeholders.

1.2

Determine any internal limiting factors which will constrain the introduction of competitive systems and practices.

1.3

Determine any external limiting factors which will constrain the introduction of competitive systems and practices.

1.4

Quantify expected returns from achieving the benefits of introducing competitive systems and practices.

2

Develop strategic and tactical plans to introduce competitive systems and practices to the SME

2.1

Develop a strategic plan for the SME that takes into account the nature of its business and relationships with suppliers and customers.

2.2

Where required, seek authority for the implementation of the strategic plan.

2.3

Identify components of competitive strategy which will yield quick returns.

2.4

Identify actions which will free up required resources to allow for the introduction of competitive systems and practices.

2.5

Develop achievable tactical plans which are compatible with strategy.

2.6

Develop key performance indicators (KPIs) for strategic and tactical plans.

2.7

Consult with relevant stakeholders to confirm tactical plans.

2.8

Prioritise plans for order of implementation.

3

Implement competitive systems and practices

3.1

Implement priority tactical plan.

3.2

Determine benefits from change.

3.3

Use benefits from priority plan to assist in the implementation of further tactical plans.

3.4

Review progress towards strategic objectives and adjust plans, as appropriate, in consultation with relevant stakeholders.

This field allows for different work environments and conditions that may affect performance. Essential operating conditions that may be present (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) are included.

Competitive systems and practices include one or more of:

lean operations

agile operations

preventative and predictive maintenance approaches

statistical process control systems, including six sigma and three sigma

JIT, kanban and other pull-related operations control systems

supply, value, and demand chain monitoring and analysis

5S

continuous improvement (kaizen)

breakthrough improvement (kaizen blitz)

cause/effect diagrams

overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)

takt time

process mapping

problem solving

run charts

standard procedures

current reality tree.

Stakeholders include one or more of:

managers

supervisors

employees and their representatives

shareholders

suppliers

customers

service providers.

Internal limiting factors include consideration of all of:

free cash

management time and expertise

machinery

work organisation and workforce skills and knowledge.

External limiting factors include consideration of all of:

lack of bargaining power

lack of effective communication

supplier issues

customer issues

financial institution issues

other factors.

Expected returns include one or more of:

cost savings due to more consistent or higher quality

benefits from greater on-time delivery

savings from lower inventories and reduction in waste.

Actions which will free up required resources include one or more of:

reduction of inventory

reduction of scrap

decreased throughput times

changes in approval processes/delegations

use of computers instead of paper-based processes

reduction of muda (waste).

Prioritising plans includes the consideration of all of:

greatest benefit, benefit/cost ratio

ease of implementation

best fit with strategy

available resources.

Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and include the ability to introduce competitive systems and practices to a SME and to:

analyse the organisation’s current operations

develop strategic and tactical plans for the introduction of competitive systems and practices

implement those plans.

Must provide evidence that demonstrates sufficient knowledge to interact with relevant personnel and be able to introduce competitive systems and practices to a SME, including knowledge of:

analysis of current operations/value stream mapping

competitive systems and practices tools which may be relevant

strategy vs tactics

kaizen/kaizen blitz applications

prioritisation of proposed actions/plans.

The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.

The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:

a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria

multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.

A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.

Assessment should use a real project introducing competitive systems and practices to a SME workplace.

Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).

Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.

Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.

Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.

Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.

The assessor must demonstrate both technical competency and currency.

Technical competence can be demonstrated through:

relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment AND/OR

relevant workplace experience

Currency can be demonstrated through:

performing the competency being assessed as part of current employment OR

having consulted with an organisation providing relevant environmental monitoring, management or technology services about performing the competency being assessed within the last twelve months.

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Review the reasons for introducing competitive systems and practices and confirm the expected benefits with relevant stakeholders. 
Determine any internal limiting factors which will constrain the introduction of competitive systems and practices. 
Determine any external limiting factors which will constrain the introduction of competitive systems and practices. 
Quantify expected returns from achieving the benefits of introducing competitive systems and practices. 
Develop a strategic plan for the SME that takes into account the nature of its business and relationships with suppliers and customers. 
Where required, seek authority for the implementation of the strategic plan. 
Identify components of competitive strategy which will yield quick returns. 
Identify actions which will free up required resources to allow for the introduction of competitive systems and practices. 
Develop achievable tactical plans which are compatible with strategy. 
Develop key performance indicators (KPIs) for strategic and tactical plans. 
Consult with relevant stakeholders to confirm tactical plans. 
Prioritise plans for order of implementation. 
Implement priority tactical plan. 
Determine benefits from change. 
Use benefits from priority plan to assist in the implementation of further tactical plans. 
Review progress towards strategic objectives and adjust plans, as appropriate, in consultation with relevant stakeholders. 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

MSS405007 - Introduce competitive systems and practices to a small or medium enterprise
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

MSS405007 - Introduce competitive systems and practices to a small or medium enterprise

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: